2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (118 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 78 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Alfa Romeo 156 2004 Mazda 3
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model 156 3
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1597 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 203 Nm
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.6 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1282 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.9 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 55 L