2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2006 BMW 323
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (144 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 2006 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (169 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2006 BMW 323 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
Model | 156 | 323 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1746 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 78.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 229 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.6 seconds | 7.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 63 L |