2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (120 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 156 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 4198 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 17.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 114 L |