2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 1,746 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (144 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (169 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Nissan |
Model | 156 | Micra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1746 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 169 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 46 L |