2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (143 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (172 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 156 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |