2000 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1958 Alpine A 106
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 1958 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1958 Alpine A 106 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Alpine |
Model | 166 | A 106 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 904 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2110 mm |