2000 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel

To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 607 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 (181 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 1967 Riley Kestrel
Make Alfa Romeo Riley
Model 166 Kestrel
Year Released 2000 1967
Engine Size 1970 cc 1098 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 53 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 181 Nm 83 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1495 kg 888 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 3730 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2380 mm