2000 Alpina B 10 vs. 1957 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 Alpina B 10 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alpina B 10 (342 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1957 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alpina B 10 should accelerate faster than 1957 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 264 kg more than 2000 Alpina B 10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1957 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2000 Alpina B 10 has manual transmission. 2000 Alpina B 10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alpina B 10 | 1957 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alpina | Cadillac |
Model | B 10 | 62 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 5424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 2004 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3290 mm |