2000 Alpina B 10 vs. 1994 Caterham Seven
To start off, 2000 Alpina B 10 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 4,619 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Alpina B 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alpina B 10 (342 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1994 Caterham Seven. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alpina B 10 should accelerate faster than 1994 Caterham Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B 10 weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alpina B 10 (490 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Caterham Seven. (203 Nm). This means 2000 Alpina B 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alpina B 10 | 1994 Caterham Seven | |
Make | Alpina | Caterham |
Model | B 10 | Seven |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 490 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2240 mm |