2000 Alpina B 12 vs. 1961 Mitsubishi A10
To start off, 2000 Alpina B 12 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 1315 kg more than 1961 Mitsubishi A10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 435 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. (34 Nm). This means 2000 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mitsubishi A10.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Alpina B 12 | 1961 Mitsubishi A10 | |
| Make | Alpina | Mitsubishi |
| Model | B 12 | A10 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 20 HP |
| Torque | 469 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2070 mm |
