2000 Alpina B 12 vs. 1965 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2000 Alpina B 12 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1965 Steyr Haflinger.
Because 1965 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Alpina B 12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm). This means 2000 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Alpina B 12 | 1965 Steyr Haflinger | |
| Make | Alpina | Steyr |
| Model | B 12 | Haflinger |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
| Torque | 469 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 2840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1360 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1510 mm |
