2000 Alpina B 12 vs. 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 2000 Alpina B 12 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. (194 Nm). This means 2000 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alpina B 12 | 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
Make | Alpina | Willys-Overland |
Model | B 12 | Aero-Willys 2600 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 194 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2740 mm |