2000 Alpina B 12 vs. 1982 Renault 11
To start off, 2000 Alpina B 12 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 11 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 872 kg more than 1982 Renault 11.
Because 2000 Alpina B 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Alpina B 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 11. (161 Nm). This means 2000 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 11.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alpina B 12 | 1982 Renault 11 | |
Make | Alpina | Renault |
Model | B 12 | 11 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 161 Nm |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2490 mm |