2000 Alpina B 12 vs. 2010 Ferrari California
To start off, 2010 Ferrari California is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ferrari California is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2010 Ferrari California.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ferrari California (483 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alpina B 12. (469 Nm). This means 2010 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alpina B 12.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alpina B 12 | 2010 Ferrari California | |
Make | Alpina | Ferrari |
Model | B 12 | California |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 460 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 483 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4562 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1308 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2670 mm |