2000 Alpina B3 vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2000 Alpina B3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. (275 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 190 kg more than 2000 Alpina B3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Alpina B3 | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Alpina | Chevrolet |
| Model | B3 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3299 cc | 6476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3030 mm |
