2000 Alpina B3 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Alpina B3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B3 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alpina B3 (363 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alpina B3 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Alpina | Triumph |
Model | B3 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 363 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.8 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 64 L |