2000 Alpina B3 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alpina B3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alpina B3 would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B3 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alpina B3 (362 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2000 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alpina B3 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Alpina | Suzuki |
Model | B3 | F1 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 362 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |