2000 Alpina B3 vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alpina B3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alpina B3 would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alpina B3 (301 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot 508. (201 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot 508.
Because 2000 Alpina B3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Alpina B3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alpina B3 (363 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Peugeot 508. (338 Nm). This means 2000 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Peugeot 508.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Alpina B3 | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
| Make | Alpina | Peugeot |
| Model | B3 | 508 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3299 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 201 HP |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4792 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1853 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2817 mm |
