2000 Ariel Atom vs. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2000 Ariel Atom is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2000 Ariel Atom. (109 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2000 Ariel Atom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 690 kg more than 2000 Ariel Atom. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ariel Atom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ariel Atom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ariel Atom | 1981 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Ariel | Cadillac |
Model | Atom | Cimarron |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2580 mm |