2000 Ariel Atom vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Ariel Atom is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 860 kg more than 2000 Ariel Atom.
Because 2000 Ariel Atom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ariel Atom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ariel Atom | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ariel | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Atom | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2680 mm |
