2000 Ariel Atom vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2000 Ariel Atom is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2000 Ariel Atom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ariel Atom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ariel Atom. (149 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ariel Atom. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2000 Ariel Atom has manual transmission. 2000 Ariel Atom will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ariel Atom | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Ariel | Holden |
| Model | Atom | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
