2000 Ariel Atom vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ariel Atom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ariel Atom would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 235 more horse power than 2000 Ariel Atom. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2000 Ariel Atom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 381 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ariel Atom. (149 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ariel Atom. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2000 Ariel Atom has manual transmission. 2000 Ariel Atom will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ariel Atom | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Ariel | Holden |
| Model | Atom | Calais |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
