2000 Aston Martin DB7 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2000 Aston Martin DB7 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Aston Martin DB7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Aston Martin DB7 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 384 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Aston Martin DB7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Aston Martin DB7 weights approximately 502 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Aston Martin DB7 (556 Nm) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm). This means 2000 Aston Martin DB7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Aston Martin DB7 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Triumph |
| Model | DB7 | Renown |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5935 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2750 mm |
