2000 Aston Martin DB7 vs. 1954 Austin A 40
To start off, 2000 Aston Martin DB7 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Aston Martin DB7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Aston Martin DB7 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 409 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Aston Martin DB7 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Aston Martin DB7 weights approximately 756 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Aston Martin DB7 | 1954 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
Model | DB7 | A 40 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1026 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2530 mm |