2000 Audi A2 vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2000 Audi A2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A2 (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 10 kg more than 2000 Audi A2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A2 (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A2 | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A2 | Colt |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2360 mm |