2000 Audi A2 vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2000 Audi A2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Proton 400 (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2000 Audi A2. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2000 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 126 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A2 | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Audi | Proton |
Model | A2 | 400 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2510 mm |