2000 Audi A2 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A2 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2000 Audi A2. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 400 kg more than 2000 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi A2. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A2 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | A2 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 61 L |
