2000 Audi A4 vs. 1941 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 349 kg more than 2000 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A4 | 1941 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A4 | 60 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 5672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3230 mm |
