2000 Audi A4 vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A4 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1950 Riley RM A.
Because 1950 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A4 | 1950 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | A4 | RM A |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2870 mm |
