2000 Audi A4 vs. 1961 Jaguar MK IX
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (163 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4.
Because 2000 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Jaguar MK IX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (330 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi A4. (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar MK IX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 1961 Jaguar MK IX | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A4 | MK IX |
Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 3779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 234 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 106 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |