2000 Audi A4 vs. 1961 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A4 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A4 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1961 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A4 (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 1961 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A4 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2540 mm |