2000 Audi A4 vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 885 kg more than 2000 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A4 | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Audi | Lincoln |
| Model | A4 | Continental |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2976 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3210 mm |
