2000 Audi A4 vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A4 (150 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A4 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A4 (204 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | A4 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 204 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2430 mm |