2000 Audi A4 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 660 kg more than 2000 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A4 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A4 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 95 L |
