2000 Audi A4 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A4 (247 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A4 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A4 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | A4 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2380 mm |