2000 Audi A4 vs. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A4 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A4 (230 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A4 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2740 mm |