2000 Audi A4 vs. 1994 Nissan 270 R
To start off, 2000 Audi A4 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan 270 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan 270 R would be higher. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan 270 R (270 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (247 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan 270 R should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A4 weights approximately 194 kg more than 1994 Nissan 270 R.
Because 1994 Nissan 270 R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Nissan 270 R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan 270 R (344 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi A4. (320 Nm). This means 1994 Nissan 270 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 1994 Nissan 270 R | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A4 | 270 R |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 344 Nm |
Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 273 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |