2000 Audi A4 vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A4 weights approximately 315 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi A4. (339 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A4 | 2002 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Audi | BMW |
| Model | A4 | M3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 480 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2890 mm |
