2000 Audi A4 vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A4 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 693 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A4 weights approximately 375 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2000 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 786 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi A4. (204 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Audi | Lotec |
Model | A4 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1150 mm |