2000 Audi A4 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A4 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi A4. (339 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A4 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |