2000 Audi A4 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (163 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi A4. (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A4 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 234 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 85 L |