2000 Audi A4 vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2000 Audi A4. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 78 kg more than 2000 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi A4. (339 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A4 | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A4 | Z |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11:01:00 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1315 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |