2000 Audi A6 vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2000 Audi A6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A6 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1954 Talbot T 26. (198 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2000 Audi A6.
Because 1954 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A6 | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Audi | Talbot |
Model | A6 | T 26 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1890 mm |