2000 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2000 Audi A6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A6 weights approximately 586 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A6 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A6 | EJ |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2680 mm |