2000 Audi A6 vs. 1972 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 2000 Audi A6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 2000 Audi A6. (178 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A6 weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A6 | 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | |
| Make | Audi | Matra-Simca |
| Model | A6 | M670 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 2698 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2570 mm |
