2000 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Audi A6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A6 weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A6 (339 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A6 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | A6 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2670 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2160 mm |
