2000 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A6 weights approximately 247 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2000 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Audi A6 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model A6 Tracker
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2669 cc 2491 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 247 HP 165 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 350 Nm 221 Nm
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 75 mm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1373 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]