2000 Audi A6 vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A6 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 2000 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A6 | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | A6 | 75 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 89.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 246 km/hour | 213 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |