2000 Audi A6 vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A6 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A6 (380 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A6 | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | A6 | 75 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |