2000 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A6 (247 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Because 2000 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A6 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A6 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |